Date of Award
Summer 1986
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Science (MS)
Department
Psychology
Program/Concentration
Psychology
Committee Director
Terry L. Dickinson
Committee Member
Anthony T. Dalessio
Committee Member
David L. Pancoast
Committee Member
Glynn D. Coates
Call Number for Print
Special Collections LD4331.P65F42
Abstract
The two most commonly identified methods of rating the In-Basket both involve the use of checklists. These checklists differ primarily in the way that the items on them are organized. In one (the Dimension Oriented Format), the items pertaining to the entire In-Basket are grouped under the dimension they represent (Frederiksen, Jensen, & Beaton, 1972). In the other (the Item Oriented Format), items representing all dimensions are grouped under the exercise in which they .might be expected to occur (Jaffee, 1971). This study investigated the construct validity of In-Basket ratings obtained using these two formats.
The results of an analysis of variance performed on the dimension scores did provide evidence for the construct validity of the two checklists. Effects indicating convergent validity and discriminant validity were both significant while those indicating method bias and measurement and sampling error were not. There were no differences in the convergent validities or discriminant validities of the two formats. Further investigation indicated that the Item Oriented Format enjoyed a higher degree of user acceptance and required approximately 50% less time to use. Based on this evidence, it is suggested that the Item Oriented Checklist might be the best alternative for rating the In-Basket.
Intraclass correlation coefficients were compared with those obtained in other -construct validation efforts and possible explanations for the differences were discussed.
Rights
In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
DOI
10.25777/s3m4-yf29
Recommended Citation
Fedorko, Michael G..
"A Multitrait-Multimethod Investigation of Two Checklist Formats for Rating the In-Basket"
(1986). Master of Science (MS), Thesis, Psychology, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/s3m4-yf29
https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/psychology_etds/558