Plain and Steel-Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls With and Without CFRP Retrofitting
Date of Award
Master of Science (MS)
Civil & Environmental Engineering
M. B. Sirjani
Call Number for Print
Special Collections LD4331.E542 A46 2010
This thesis presents the outcome- of a study of the behavior and strength of plain and steel-reinforced concrete shear walls with and without a window opening and Carbon Fi.her-Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) retrofitting. A total of seven tests were conducted using six different shear walls. Each wall was subjected to a gradually increasing static load at one of it's top corners until the maximum load was reached. The load-deflection relations and the walls' failure patterns were observed and recorded. It was found that the window opening in the plain concrete wall reduced the wall load capacity by 18 percent. For the wall without an opening, CFRP retrofitting provided a dramatic 63.4 percent increase in the ultimate strength. The steel reinforced wall with an opening experienced a surprising 21 percent reduction in the ultimate load relative to that for the plain concrete wall. It was also found that the ACI Code is seriously unconservative for the plain concrete wall without opening; however, it is conservative for the steel-reinforced wall. Likewise, the ETABS software based on the finite element method gave seriously flawed load-deflection curves. On the contrary, a strut-and-tie model developed and presented in this thesis for the steel reinforced wall without opening is found to be in good agreement with the experimental results.
In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
Aloosi, Ali M..
"Plain and Steel-Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls With and Without CFRP Retrofitting"
(2010). Master of Science (MS), Thesis, Civil & Environmental Engineering, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/p1tw-qw26