Impact of Behavioral and Cognitive Disorders on Residential Status at Discharge from Mental Health Facilities: Evidence from SAMHSA MH-CLD Data
Department
Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Environmental Health
Graduate Level
Master’s
Graduate Program/Concentration
Master of Public Health (MPH), Joint School of Public Health
Presentation Type
No Preference
Abstract
Background: Behavioral and cognitive disorders are significant public health concerns, often influencing housing stability and residential outcomes. Access to stable housing is a key determinant of mental health recovery, yet disparities persist across different demographic and socioeconomic groups. This study examines the association between behavioral and cognitive disorders and residential status at discharge from mental health facilities.
Methods: Using the 2022 Mental Health Client-Level Data (MH-CLD) from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), this cross-sectional study analyzed the relationship between primary behavioral and cognitive disorders—such as ADHD, Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD), and Personality Disorders—and residential status upon discharge. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic and clinical characteristics, while logistic regression models were employed to assess associations between disorders and residential outcomes, adjusting for age, race, employment status, education, substance use, and gender.
Results: Of the 6,957,919 individuals analyzed, 3.7% experienced homelessness, 11.4% resided in alternative settings (e.g., foster care, residential treatment, correctional facilities), and 84.9% lived in private residences. Individuals with behavioral and cognitive disorders were significantly less likely to reside in private residences compared to those without such disorders (AOR = 0.876, 95% CI: 0.866–0.887, p < 0.0001). Additional factors such as substance use (AOR = 0.798, 95% CI: 0.787–0.809, p < 0.0001), unemployment (AOR = 2.60, 5% CI: 2.578–2.624, p < 0.0001), and lower education levels AOR = 1.543, 95% CI: 1.526–1.561, p < 0.0001) further predicted non-private residential outcomes. Racial and gender disparities were also looked at, with African Americans being 34% more likely to experience non-private residential placements compared to white individuals (AOR = 1.340, 95% CI: 1.323–1.358, p < 0.0001). Additionally, males had greater odds of experiencing homelessness or alternative housing compared to females (AOR = 1.192, 95% CI: 1.176–1.208, p < 0.0001).
Conclusion: The findings highlight the intersection of mental health disorders, socioeconomic factors, and housing stability. Individuals with behavioral and cognitive disorders face significant barriers to stable housing, exacerbated by substance use, unemployment, and racial disparities. These results reinforce the need for integrated mental health and housing interventions, with a focus on culturally competent, equity-driven policies to improve residential stability for vulnerable populations.
Keywords
Behavioral disorders, Cognitive disorders, Residential status, Mental health, Public health, Epidemiology, Housing stability, Socioeconomic disparities
Impact of Behavioral and Cognitive Disorders on Residential Status at Discharge from Mental Health Facilities: Evidence from SAMHSA MH-CLD Data
Background: Behavioral and cognitive disorders are significant public health concerns, often influencing housing stability and residential outcomes. Access to stable housing is a key determinant of mental health recovery, yet disparities persist across different demographic and socioeconomic groups. This study examines the association between behavioral and cognitive disorders and residential status at discharge from mental health facilities.
Methods: Using the 2022 Mental Health Client-Level Data (MH-CLD) from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), this cross-sectional study analyzed the relationship between primary behavioral and cognitive disorders—such as ADHD, Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD), and Personality Disorders—and residential status upon discharge. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic and clinical characteristics, while logistic regression models were employed to assess associations between disorders and residential outcomes, adjusting for age, race, employment status, education, substance use, and gender.
Results: Of the 6,957,919 individuals analyzed, 3.7% experienced homelessness, 11.4% resided in alternative settings (e.g., foster care, residential treatment, correctional facilities), and 84.9% lived in private residences. Individuals with behavioral and cognitive disorders were significantly less likely to reside in private residences compared to those without such disorders (AOR = 0.876, 95% CI: 0.866–0.887, p < 0.0001). Additional factors such as substance use (AOR = 0.798, 95% CI: 0.787–0.809, p < 0.0001), unemployment (AOR = 2.60, 5% CI: 2.578–2.624, p < 0.0001), and lower education levels AOR = 1.543, 95% CI: 1.526–1.561, p < 0.0001) further predicted non-private residential outcomes. Racial and gender disparities were also looked at, with African Americans being 34% more likely to experience non-private residential placements compared to white individuals (AOR = 1.340, 95% CI: 1.323–1.358, p < 0.0001). Additionally, males had greater odds of experiencing homelessness or alternative housing compared to females (AOR = 1.192, 95% CI: 1.176–1.208, p < 0.0001).
Conclusion: The findings highlight the intersection of mental health disorders, socioeconomic factors, and housing stability. Individuals with behavioral and cognitive disorders face significant barriers to stable housing, exacerbated by substance use, unemployment, and racial disparities. These results reinforce the need for integrated mental health and housing interventions, with a focus on culturally competent, equity-driven policies to improve residential stability for vulnerable populations.