Otoliths, scales, dorsal spines, and pectoral-fin rays were compared to ascertain the best hardpart for determining the age of weakfish, Cynoscion regalis. Each showed concentric marks, which could be interpreted as annuli. Sectioned otoliths, however, consistently showed the clearest marks, had 100% agreement between and within readers, and were validated by the marginal increment method for ages 1-5. This validated method of ageing weakfish was then compared with the traditionally used scale method. The scale method was less precise, as demonstrated by lower percent agreement, and generally assigned younger ages for fish older than age 6 (as determined by otoliths). Consequently, mean sizes at age based on scales showed no clear signs of an asymptote, whereas those based on otoliths did. Otolith annuli formed in April and May, whereas scale annulus formation was more variable, ranging from April to August. This extended time of annulus formation made scales poorly suited for back calculation.
Original Publication Citation
Lowerrebarbieri, S.K., Chittenden, M.E., & Jones, C.M. (1994). A comparison of a validated otolith method to age weakfish, Cynoscion regalis, with the traditional scale method. Fishery Bulletin, 92(3), 555-568.
Lowerre-Barbieri, Susan K.; Chittenden, Mark E. Jr.; and Jones, Cynthia M., "A Comparison of a Validated Otolith Method to Age Weakfish, Cynoscion regalis, With the Traditional Scale Method" (1994). OEAS Faculty Publications. 38.