Restall (Erkenntnis 79(2):279–291, 2014) proposes a new, proof-theoretic, logical pluralism. This is in contrast to the model-theoretic pluralism he and Beall proposed in Beall and Restall (Aust J Philos 78(4):475–493, 2000) and in Beall and Restall (Logical pluralism, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006). What I will show is that Restall has not described the conditions on being admissible to the proof-theoretic logical pluralism in such a way that relevance logic is one of the admissible logics. Though relevance logic is not hard to add formally, one critical component of Restall’s pluralism is that the relevance logic that gets added must have connectives which mean the same thing as the connectives in the already admitted logic. This is what I will show is not possible.
Original Publication Citation
Kouri, T. (2016). Restall’s proof-theoretic pluralism and relevance logic. Erkenntnis, 81(6), 1243-1252. doi:10.1007/s10670-015-9792-4
0000-0001-6519-1723 (Kouri Kissel)
Kouri, Teresa, "Restall's Proof-Theoretic Pluralism and Relevance Logic" (2016). Philosophy Faculty Publications. 57.
This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Erkenntnis. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10670-015-9792-4