Date of Award

Spring 2021

Document Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Department

Counseling & Human Services

Program/Concentration

Counselor Education and Supervision

Committee Director

Kristy Carlisle

Committee Member

Emily Goodman Scott

Committee Member

Jonna Bobzien

Abstract

Alternative educational settings are serving students with emotional disabilities (ED) at an increasing rate; however, there a paucity of research examining the effectiveness of these programs. A review of the existing literature targeting students with problematic behaviors, supports the use of a positive, preventative, proactive, and systematic approaches such as the three-tiered, Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support (PBIS) framework. Although findings suggest that the PBIS framework is associated with favorable outcomes for students with ED in both traditional and nontraditional settings, few studies have explicitly examined whether PBIS can be effectively modified to fit the needs of students with ED in alternative education settings. As such, the current qualitative study aimed to address these gaps in the related literature by examining how and why PBIS was effective for students with ED in alternative education. A single case-study design was used to collect evidence of PBIS implementation for students in this population from the direct interviews of five staff members, archival school records, and PBIS-related documentation. Braun and Clarke’s (2006) six-step thematic analysis was used to interpret data and develop themes, resulting in the emergence of three specific themes: 1) strategies and practices; 2) data tracking: measuring progress and outcomes; and 3) systems and structures. In addition, the case study team identified nine corresponding subthemes to support these themes. Findings illustrated the specific adaptations and modifications made to the PBIS framework, contributing to the effective implementation of the strategy and meeting the needs of students in the ED population. Findings of this study provided several implications for constituents and potential future areas of research.

Rights

In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).

DOI

10.25777/3kzv-ge55

ISBN

9798534691047

Download

Share

COinS