Date of Award

Summer 2024

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Master of Science in Dental Hygiene (MSDH)

Department

Dental Hygiene

Committee Director

Emily Ludwig

Committee Member

Jessica Suedbeck

Committee Member

Adaira Howell

Abstract

Purpose: Bias and discrimination may create barriers and affect the delivery of culturally competent care to sexual minorities. An awareness of biases early in education may promote equitable care and increase the quality of oral healthcare delivered to diverse populations. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of sexuality-implicit attitudes in entry-level dental hygiene students at one university. Methods: This cross-sectional study included a convenience sample of junior and senior dental hygiene students (n=74) and was determined exempt by a university Health Sciences Human Subjects Review Committee (2151633-2). The Implicit Associations Test (IAT) is a validated tool used to measure implicit bias. For this pilot study, the validated Sexuality IAT was modified for use in dentistry with permission from Project Implicit®. The IAT requires participants to rapidly pair two social groups, in this case, homosexual and heterosexual individuals, with either positive or negative attributes (words/concepts), using the “E” and “I” computer keyboard keys. Faster average response times to pairings indicate a preference for a group. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the means between groups and determine the prevalence of sexuality implicit biases. Independent samples t-test was utilized to examine for statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in the level of implicit bias based on the year in the dental hygiene program (1st or 2nd). One way between subjects ANOVA was used to examine for differences in age groups (p < 0.05). Results: Seventy dental hygiene students (n=70) completed the survey, (n=34 1st year, n=36 2nd year).The average overall implicit score for first-year students was 0.001 (no sexuality preference), and 0.069 for second-year students (no sexuality preference). When comparing year in dental hygiene program and age groups, no statistically significant differences were found. Conclusion: Undergraduate dental hygiene students had no sexuality bias for heterosexual or homosexual individuals. More research is needed on a larger sample to determine awareness. Additionally, the use of interventions that aim to mitigate biases towards LGBTQ+ individuals.

Rights

In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).

DOI

10.25777/b2gb-xx25

ISBN

9798384454397

Download

Share

COinS