Date of Award

Fall 12-2025

Document Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Program/Concentration

Educational Leadership

Committee Director

Steve Myran

Committee Member

Jori Beck

Committee Member

Angela Isbel

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the experiences, perceptions, and practices of school principals related to evidence-based change initiatives and the continued divide between the findings of educational researchers and the use of these findings by school practitioners. Since the prevalent dichotomy of theory and practice is detrimental to school improvement efforts, it is important to examine the underlying values and beliefs that contribute to perpetuating this divide. For this qualitative phenomenological study, semi-structured interviews with seven elementary school principals provided first-hand accounts of the principals' lived experiences. Through an iterative process of coding, clustering, and cross-case analysis, a set of six interrelated themes emerged that illuminate how principals experience and make sense of evidence-based change initiatives. These themes are not isolated categories but interconnected dimensions of a larger phenomenon. To reflect this complexity, the findings are presented as The Four Phase Initiative Fatigue Model: Mediated Cycles of Ambivalence, Sense-Making Constraints, Drift, and Recurrence depicting both the distinct elements of principals’ sense-making and the dynamic relationships among them. This cyclical, four-phase model outlines how principals experience research-based change initiatives where new mandates typically enter schools already saturated with initiative history, producing a starting point of ambivalence and fatigue. During implementation, sense-making is constrained by mediating factors such as time scarcity, limited access to research, low psychological safety, and hierarchical pressures. These constraints lead to an epistemic drift – a shift away from engaging with the research-based principles of an initiative and toward procedural compliance. Because implementation under these conditions rarely produces the intended outcomes, the need for improvement persists, prompting the cycle to repeat. Implications include a greater priority on preserving time and creating psychologically safe spaces to engage in the kinds of collaborative sense-making needed to implement research-based practices with fidelity. Similarly, policymakers at all levels should re-conceptualize reform and improvement processes to normalize uncertainty and questioning, and shift from monitoring and supervision to scaffolding and supporting iterative and reciprocal professional learning and growth.

Rights

In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).

DOI

10.25777/q2mh-sh52

Download

Share

COinS