Evolving Ocular Safety Signals of EGFR Inhibitors: A FAERS Disproportionality Analysis of Amivantamab, Mobocertinib, and Classic Agents

Abstract/Description/Artist Statement

Background Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) inhibitors, while effective in oncology, are associated with under-characterized ocular adverse events (AEs). Prior studies have been limited in scope, lacking a comprehensive, class-wide analysis of the full spectrum of ocular toxicity, particularly for newer agents.

Methods We conducted a disproportionality analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) (2001-2025). Twelve EGFR-targeted agents were evaluated against a pre-specified set of ocular MedDRA Preferred Terms. To ensure robust signal detection, a significant association was defined by ≥3 co-reported cases, a Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) ≥2.0, and a false-discovery-rate adjusted p-value < 0.05. Results Among 6,976,462 drug-event combinations, 20 met all signal criteria for Eyelash Abnormalities, Ocular Surface Disease, or Vision‑Threatening and Intraocular Events. Trichomegaly demonstrated extreme disproportionality (e.g., panitumumab PRR= 465.3, 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 247.7-874.3). A consistent pattern of ocular surface toxicity (conjunctivitis, keratitis, blepharitis) was observed across multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies, indicating a class-wide effect. Signals for serious events included corneal perforation (erlotinib, n= 7, PRR=13.9, 95% CI= 6.6-29.4) and optic neuropathy (erlotinib, n= 6, PRR= 2.9, 95% CI= 1.3-6.4).

Conclusion This analysis confirms a strong, class-wide signal for ocular toxicity across the spectrum of EGFR inhibitors, from characteristic eyelid changes to sight-threatening complications. These findings underscore the necessity for proactive ophthalmologic monitoring, including baseline assessment, in patients receiving these therapies to preserve vision and maintain quality of life during cancer treatment.

Presenting Author Name/s

Zaid Khan

Faculty Advisor/Mentor

Thomas J Joly

Faculty Advisor/Mentor Email

tjoly@cvphealth.com

Faculty Advisor/Mentor Department

Ophthalmology

College/School Affiliation

Eastern Virginia School of Medicine

Student Level Group

Medical

Presentation Type

Poster

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 

Evolving Ocular Safety Signals of EGFR Inhibitors: A FAERS Disproportionality Analysis of Amivantamab, Mobocertinib, and Classic Agents

Background Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) inhibitors, while effective in oncology, are associated with under-characterized ocular adverse events (AEs). Prior studies have been limited in scope, lacking a comprehensive, class-wide analysis of the full spectrum of ocular toxicity, particularly for newer agents.

Methods We conducted a disproportionality analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) (2001-2025). Twelve EGFR-targeted agents were evaluated against a pre-specified set of ocular MedDRA Preferred Terms. To ensure robust signal detection, a significant association was defined by ≥3 co-reported cases, a Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) ≥2.0, and a false-discovery-rate adjusted p-value < 0.05. Results Among 6,976,462 drug-event combinations, 20 met all signal criteria for Eyelash Abnormalities, Ocular Surface Disease, or Vision‑Threatening and Intraocular Events. Trichomegaly demonstrated extreme disproportionality (e.g., panitumumab PRR= 465.3, 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 247.7-874.3). A consistent pattern of ocular surface toxicity (conjunctivitis, keratitis, blepharitis) was observed across multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies, indicating a class-wide effect. Signals for serious events included corneal perforation (erlotinib, n= 7, PRR=13.9, 95% CI= 6.6-29.4) and optic neuropathy (erlotinib, n= 6, PRR= 2.9, 95% CI= 1.3-6.4).

Conclusion This analysis confirms a strong, class-wide signal for ocular toxicity across the spectrum of EGFR inhibitors, from characteristic eyelid changes to sight-threatening complications. These findings underscore the necessity for proactive ophthalmologic monitoring, including baseline assessment, in patients receiving these therapies to preserve vision and maintain quality of life during cancer treatment.