Governance Fragmentation and Stakeholder Alignment in the Reuse and Recycling Ecosystem

Abstract/Description/Artist Statement

This study contributes to an ongoing research program examining stakeholder governance within the North American reuse and recycling ecosystem (RRE). Focusing on industry discourse, this component analyzes 33 issues (2023–2025) of Resource Recycling, a leading trade publication, encompassing 480 articles and more than 1,300 pages of reporting on regulatory activity, market volatility, technological innovation, and infrastructure development. Using inductive thematic coding, the analysis investigates how heterogeneous stakeholder purposes are represented across policy reporting, market analysis, and industry commentary. Preliminary findings reveal three recurring structural tensions. First, governance fragmentation arises from competing and overlapping federal, state, and international mandates, particularly around Extended Producer Responsibility, producing shifting patterns of stakeholder influence. Second, market narratives oscillate between investment optimism and stagnation, highlighting persistent cost pressures, commodity volatility, and underutilized processing capacity. Third, technological advancement is frequently framed as a mechanism for compliance and efficiency, yet its deployment reflects deeper coordination challenges among producers, recyclers, regulators, and technology providers. Across the dataset, aspirational commitments to circular economy principles coexist with repeated accounts of structural misalignment. These patterns suggest that environmental outcomes within the RRE are shaped less by isolated firm intent and more by the alignment of diverse stakeholders operating under incongruous governance. By analyzing industry discourse, this research provides insight into how organizational purpose is translated, or constrained, within a complex sustainability system.

Presenting Author Name/s

Eric L. Holland

Faculty Advisor/Mentor

Kris Irwin

Faculty Advisor/Mentor Email

kirwin@odu.edu

Faculty Advisor/Mentor Department

Department of Management

College/School Affiliation

Strome College of Business

Student Level Group

Graduate/Professional

Presentation Type

Poster

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 

Governance Fragmentation and Stakeholder Alignment in the Reuse and Recycling Ecosystem

This study contributes to an ongoing research program examining stakeholder governance within the North American reuse and recycling ecosystem (RRE). Focusing on industry discourse, this component analyzes 33 issues (2023–2025) of Resource Recycling, a leading trade publication, encompassing 480 articles and more than 1,300 pages of reporting on regulatory activity, market volatility, technological innovation, and infrastructure development. Using inductive thematic coding, the analysis investigates how heterogeneous stakeholder purposes are represented across policy reporting, market analysis, and industry commentary. Preliminary findings reveal three recurring structural tensions. First, governance fragmentation arises from competing and overlapping federal, state, and international mandates, particularly around Extended Producer Responsibility, producing shifting patterns of stakeholder influence. Second, market narratives oscillate between investment optimism and stagnation, highlighting persistent cost pressures, commodity volatility, and underutilized processing capacity. Third, technological advancement is frequently framed as a mechanism for compliance and efficiency, yet its deployment reflects deeper coordination challenges among producers, recyclers, regulators, and technology providers. Across the dataset, aspirational commitments to circular economy principles coexist with repeated accounts of structural misalignment. These patterns suggest that environmental outcomes within the RRE are shaped less by isolated firm intent and more by the alignment of diverse stakeholders operating under incongruous governance. By analyzing industry discourse, this research provides insight into how organizational purpose is translated, or constrained, within a complex sustainability system.