Date of Award
Summer 2013
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Science (MS)
Department
Ocean & Earth Sciences
Program/Concentration
Ocean and Earth Sciences
Committee Director
G. Richard Whittecar
Committee Member
Joseph H. Rule
Committee Member
Jennifer Georgen
Call Number for Print
Special Collections LD4331.O35 D63 2013
Abstract
In the Piedmont region of Virginia, development pressures are increasing the demand for mitigation wetlands but appropriate construction sites are relatively scarce due to local topography and geology. Many existing water budget models used for planned mitigation sites exhibit considerable error when estimating groundwater fluxes, particularly for historical years that lack hydraulic head data. This difficulty has led many planners to neglect or underestimate the contribution of groundwater to wetland water budgets, resulting in mitigation sites that fail to create the appropriate hydrology for the desired vegetation community. However, reliable estimations of groundwater input contributing to wetland water budgets can be generated by coupling models that reconstruct historic hydrographs (e.g. Effective Monthly Recharge (Wem) model) with mass balance water budget models that account for soil storage ( e.g. WetBud, development in progress). Using these models to simulate years that represent a range of hydrologic conditions (e.g. wet, normal, and dry years) can provide planners with critical information regarding the contribution of specific water budget inputs such as groundwater input.
Two case studies of natural toe-slope wetlands located in the central Piedmont of Virginia demonstrate the Wem is effective in predicting monthly head elevations for wells in Piedmont hillslope and toe-slope landscape positions (NSE > 0.84). Predicted head levels for wet, normal, and dry years were used in the calculation of groundwater input using Darcy's Law. Monthly water budgets generated using the WetBud Basic Scenario tool for two wet, two normal, and two dry years at each wetland reveal that groundwater input accounts for approximately 20% of total water budget inputs on any given year, regardless of total precipitation. However, seasonal variations in the relative contribution of groundwater to water budget inputs suggest that local floodplain morphology is the major factor influencing hydrology at each site. Overall, this study demonstrates that when coupled with the Effective Monthly Recharge (Wem) model, the WetBud Basic Scenario tool provides a practical platform that can be used to reliably predict the contribution of groundwater to wetland water budgets for years that lack observed water level data.
Rights
In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
DOI
10.25777/b4bk-7c04
Recommended Citation
Dobbs, Kerby M..
"Evaluating the Contribution of Groundwater to Wetland Water Budgets Central Piedmont Virginia"
(2013). Master of Science (MS), Thesis, Ocean & Earth Sciences, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/b4bk-7c04
https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/oeas_etds/214
Included in
Fresh Water Studies Commons, Natural Resource Economics Commons, Sustainability Commons, Water Resource Management Commons