Document Type
Editorial
Publication Date
2006
DOI
10.1038/sj.embor.7400741
Publication Title
EMBO Reports
Volume
7
Issue
7
Pages
657-660
Abstract
In the March 2006 issue of EMBO reports, Christof Tannert, a bioethicist at the Max Delbrück Research Centre in Berlin, Germany, presented a moral argument against human reproductive cloning on the basis of Immanuel Kant’s categorical imperative (Tannert, 2006). In this article, I address some problems with Tannert’s views and show that our concerns about this prospective procedure should prompt us to scrutinize carefully the conventional procreative practices and attitudes. Indeed, if we set aside objections that are grounded in genetic determinism, many of the offensive features of human cloning are identical to problems with procreation by more conventional means, including both old-fashioned procreation and assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs). Oddly enough, many see only cloning as problematic, whereas identical problems with everyday procreation continue to go unnoticed.
Original Publication Citation
Pearson, Y. (2006). Never let me clone? Countering an ethical argument against the reproductive cloning of humans. EMBO Reports, 7(7), 657-660. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400741
Repository Citation
Pearson, Yvette, "Never Let Me Clone? Countering an Ethical Argument Against the Reproductive Cloning of Humans" (2006). Philosophy Faculty Publications. 41.
https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/philosophy_fac_pubs/41
Included in
Biochemistry Commons, Bioethics and Medical Ethics Commons, Cell Biology Commons, Molecular Biology Commons, Philosophy Commons
Comments
Web of Science: "Free full-text from publisher -- gold open access."