Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2023

DOI

10.3390/su152316424

Publication Title

Sustainability

Volume

15

Issue

23

Pages

16424 (1-16)

Abstract

Housing recovery, especially for vulnerable populations, can be a challenging process. Questions regarding whether to rebuild damaged housing and whether to restore it to its previous state or to build back better must be answered. In the United States, Long-Term Recovery Groups (LTRGs) play a crucial role in channeling assistance to vulnerable community members as they embark on housing recovery. However, the experiences of LTRGs have been understudied. To address this gap, the study utilizes interviews with a diverse range of LTRG members and develops an agent-based model following the Overview, Design concepts, and Details (ODD) protocol. The results highlight the consequences of adopting or not adopting a Build Back Better (BBB) approach in post-disaster recovery. Communities do not uniformly adhere to the same reconstruction approach, as evidenced by insights from LTRG interviews. BBB implementation is uneven in US LTRGs. BBB has higher initial costs but lower long-term costs because it increases community resilience and sustainability.

Rights

© 2023 by the authors.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License.

Data Availability

Article states: "Data supporting reported results will be made available at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/VRXIJG."

ORCID

0000-0002-6888-5314 (Landaeta), 0000-0002-5420-0521 (Richman)

Original Publication Citation

Landaeta, E., & Richman, J. (2023). A model of build back better utilization: Long-term recovery groups and post-disaster housing recovery. Sustainability, 15(23), 1-16, Article 16424. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316424

Download

Share

COinS