Date of Award

Fall 2006

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Master of Science (MS)

Department

Psychology

Program/Concentration

Psychology

Committee Director

James P. Bliss

Committee Member

Carryl L. Baldwin

Committee Member

Louis H. Janda

Call Number for Print

Special Collections LD4331.P65 S73 2006

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to examine the effect of sonification pulse rate and system reliability on subjective workload, urgency, trust, and monitoring performance of a dual task simulation of patient monitoring. Fifty-eight students performed a compensatory tracking and resource management task while simultaneously engaging in a patient monitoring task. Sonification pulse rate contained three levels (40ppm, 60ppm, 80ppm) and was manipulated within groups by varying the inter-pulse interval of the auditory signal. System reliability contained two levels (40%, 60%) and was manipulated between groups by varying the number of true and false problems presented by the sonification system. Perceived subjective workload, trust, and urgency were examined via questionnaires. Monitoring performance accuracy was examined using two models of SignaI Detection Theory (SDT). A series of 2 x 3 Mixed ANOVA's were used to analyze subjective and performance data. Results mainly supported our hypotheses. Specifically, results demonstrate significant effects of pulse rate and reliability on subjective workload, trust, urgency, and monitoring performance. Overall, setting the sonification to 60 ppm relative to 40ppm and 80ppm resulted in lower workload ratings, higher trust ratings, and moderate urgency ratings. Furthermore, participants made timely responses and increased decision accuracy, without increasing reaction responsiveness, when the sonification pulse rate was set to 60 ppm. These results are important for sonification design, and suggest that setting sonification pulse rate to 60 ppm can maximize monitoring accuracy without overburdening the operator. Areas of future research and practical applications are discussed.

Rights

In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).

DOI

10.25777/3v43-9x58

Download

Included in

Psychology Commons

Share

COinS