Date of Award

Summer 8-2025

Document Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Program/Concentration

Virginia Consortium Program in Clinical Psychology

Committee Director

Cathy Lau-Barraco

Committee Member

Sage E. Hawn

Committee Member

Richard W. Handel

Abstract

The motivational model of alcohol use identifies four key drinking motives – coping, conformity, social, and enhancement – as important proximal antecedents of problematic drinking. However, applications of this model have been inconsistent in explaining drinking outcomes. Specifically, it is unclear under which conditions each drinking motive can be a risky or benign indicator of drinking behaviors. The current study theorized that a problematic drinking to compensate behavior could emerge across all drinking motives when alcohol is used to counteract a psychosocial (i.e., nondrinking) deficit. It was hypothesized, at the cross-sectional and daily level, that the associations between each drinking motive and drinking outcomes would be strongest when there was the largest psychosocial deficit present for each motive. Participants were 471 college student drinkers (mean age = 20.19 years; 75.6% female; 39.7% White, 36.5% Black, 15.5% multiracial) who completed a cross-sectional survey assessing drinking behaviors, drinking motives, and psychosocial factors. Some participants (N = 150) also completed up-to 10 daily surveys assessing these same constructs. Results supported the hypothesized model for coping and conformity motives, with associations between these motives and drinking outcomes strengthened when psychosocial deficits were present. There was a marginally significant interaction between coping motives and adaptive coping when predicting drinking quantity in the cross-sectional model (β = -0.06, p = .078). For the interaction between conformity motives and thwarted belongingness, there was a marginally significant effect when predicting consequencesin the cross-sectional model (β = 0.09, p = .073) and a statistically significant effect when predicting drinking quantity in the daily model (β = 0.13, p = .005). However, no interactive effects were present in models including social or enhancement motives. Patterns were generally similar between cross-sectional and daily models, though some differences emerged. The findings suggest an interplay between drinking motives and non-drinking psychosocial factors in predicting drinking behaviors, but support was mixed and varied by motive. Limitations include narrow psychosocial constructs, simple within-person analyses, and a light-to-moderate drinker sample. As such, future research should explore the potential for multidimensionality within each psychosocial construct, complex temporal associations within individuals, and differences based on drinking severity.

Comments

The VIRGINIA CONSORTIUM PROGRAM IN CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY is a joint program of Norfolk State University and Old Dominion University.

Rights

In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).

DOI

10.25777/02vj-g269

ISBN

9798293842452

ORCID

0000-0002-9703-4199

Download

Share

COinS