Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2025
DOI
10.4085/1062-6050-0255.25
Publication Title
Journal of Athletic Training
Volume
Advance online publication
Pages
33 pp.
Abstract
Context:
The 2024 NATA Position Statement provides updated recommendations for EAP adoption. Past research on the 2002 statement showed limited adoption by ATs. Assessing current adoption across practice settings offers a clearer picture of the EAP implementation landscape.
Objectives:
To examine ATs' adoption of new EAP best-practice recommendations across practice settings.
Design:
Cross-Sectional study.
Setting:
Online questionnaire.
Patients or Other Participants:
Clinically active ATs (n=614) working in any practice setting (Youth, Secondary School, Division 1 Power 4, Collegiate athletics – Not Power 4, Non-Major Professional Sports, Professional Sports, Non-Sideline).
Main Outcome Measures:
Prevalence of an EAP, adoption of recommendations, and emergency equipment across practice settings. Median values are reported for aggregate data.
Results:
Most ATs (n=582, 94.8%) reported having an EAP, with the highest adoption among ATs practicing in the secondary school setting (n=369, 97.6%) and the lowest adoption among those working in non-sideline settings (n=27, 84.4%). On average, ATs adopted 16±7.5 (median: 18) out of 26 recommendations, with the lowest level of adoption among ATs working in the youth sports (9.5±7.9; median: 7) and the highest level of adoption among those working in the professional sports (18±9; median: 22). Bleeding control materials (n=483, 78.7%; range: 73.6%-94.7%) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation masks (n=476, 77.5%; range: 67.8%-94.7%) were the most prevalent emergency equipment available. Bronchodilators (n=108, 17.6%; range: 3.8%-47.4%) and supplemental oxygen (n=124, 20.2%; range: 3.8%-73.7%) were the least prevalent available equipment.
Conclusions:
Most ATs reported having an EAP, but fewer than 15% adopted all 2024 recommendations. These findings provide a baseline to assess setting-specific adoption and guide resource development. Emergency equipment availability varied, highlighting the need for ATs to ensure access to setting-specific emergency tools.
Rights
© 2025 National Athletic Trainers' Association. All rights reserved.
Included with the kind written permission of the copyright holder.
Original Publication Citation
Scarneo-Miller, S. E., Stearns, R. L., Eason, C. M., Pike Lacy, A. M., Lopez, R. M., Winkelmann, Z. K., Hirschhorn, R. M., & Yeargin, S. W. (2025). Emergency action plan adoption across athletic training practice settings. Journal of Athletic Training. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0255.25
Repository Citation
Scarneo-Miller, Samantha E.; Stearns, Rebecca L.; Eason, Christianne M.; Pike Lacy, Alicia M.; Lopez, Rebecca M.; Winkelmann, Zachary K.; Hirschhorn, Rebecca M.; and Yeargin, Susan W., "Emergency Action Plan Adoption Across Athletic Training Practice Settings" (2025). Rehabilitation Sciences Faculty Publications. 164.
https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/pt_pubs/164
Included in
Emergency and Disaster Management Commons, Emergency Medicine Commons, Rehabilitation and Therapy Commons