Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2025

DOI

10.1186/s12874-025-02728-6

Publication Title

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Volume

25

Issue

1

Pages

281 (1-12)

Abstract

Background

Research findings must be representative by creating a sample of individuals, ensuring the results can be generalized and applicable to a larger population, which has historically been guided by a power analysis. However, the varied research design methods require a unique approach to sampling and a formula for recruitment and size. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to analyze historical data from published manuscripts in the Journal of Athletic Training (JAT) relative to study design and sample sizes. A secondary purpose was to further explore metrics for survey-based research.

Methods

This descriptive analysis explored 1267 publications in each issue of the JAT from January 2012 (Volume 47) to December 2022 (Volume 57). We extracted publications from the JAT website. Every article was entered into a spreadsheet (year of publication, publication title) and data specific to the study design and sample size were used for analysis. For studies that were coded as survey-based research, access, response, and completion rates were completed, and topic area and use of a power analysis were extracted. Data were analyzed using measures of central tendency (mean, median, range).

Results

Of the 1267 published studies, the most frequent design was cross-sectional (394, 31.1%). In total, 1080 publications (85.2%) were not survey-based, with a median sample size of 34 participants, while 187 publications (14.8%) were survey-based, with a median sample size of 429. Among those surveys, most were cross-sectional (n = 151/187, 80.8%), with 80.7% (n = 151/187) reporting the number initially recruited and 50.8% (n = 95/187) reporting the number of surveys started. The survey publications reported recruiting an average of 4453 potential participants (median = 2500; min = 101, max = 48752), with 985 participants starting the study (median = 816, min = 57, max = 7067), and a final sample size of 819 (median = 429; min = 17, max = 13002). The grand mean access rate was 22.1%, the grand mean response rate was 18.4%, and the grand mean completion rate was 83.1%.

Conclusion

Researchers and reviewers can use these trends to guide authorship and review processes for athletic training research. However, sampling strategies should be consistent with the research question, which may lead to deviations from these reported trends.

Rights

© The Authors 2025.

The article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Data Availability

Article states: "The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request."

Original Publication Citation

Winkelmann, Z. K., Scarneo-Miller, S. E., Smith, E. C., Argetsinger, R. M., & Eberman, L. E. (2025). An 11-year (2012-2022) review of Journal of Athletic Training publication study designs and sample sizes. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 25(1), 1-12, Article 281. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02728-6

Download

Share

COinS