Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2025

DOI

10.3390/app152312740

Publication Title

Applied Sciences

Volume

15

Issue

23

Pages

12740

Abstract

Background: Clinical assessment of gait typically consists of patients walking a few trials at various speeds while the clinician assesses performance. Unfortunately, there is no clear guidance on how gait changes across trials, leaving clinicians uncertain about the optimal number of trials needed to observe consistent (non-variable) performance. To address this issue, we examined gait performance from a large dataset of older adults who participated in a community-based comprehensive fall risk assessment. Methods: Community-dwelling, older adults (n = 340; 70.8 ± 7.4 years; 120 men, 220 women) performed gait trials under two conditions: preferred and maximum walking speed. Individuals were encouraged to complete five trials for both conditions. Consistency between gait trials within each condition was calculated using intraclass correlation (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM) analysis. Results: Our data showed the middle three trials had the most consistency compared to the average of 2-5 trials. Conclusions: When performing a clinical gait analysis, the first trial should be used to acclimate the participant to the protocol and not used for analysis. Data should be recorded from the next three trials, which is when gait appears to stabilize. Data from a fifth trial differs from the second trial, potentially indicating fatigue and/or motivation changes, so it is recommended that the gait analysis conclude after the fourth trial.

Rights

© 2025 by the authors.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License.

Data Availability

Article states: "The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, B. S. S."

ORCID

0000-0001-7256-4508 (Rhea), 0000-0002-2947-2998 (Prupetkaew), 0000-0003-4519-3347 (Samulski)

Original Publication Citation

Howard, C. K., Rhea, C. K., Moxey, J. R., Langerhans, K., Prupetkaew, P., & Samulski, B. S. (2025). How many trials are needed for consistent clinical gait assessment? Applied Sciences, 15(23), Article 12740. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152312740

Download

Share

COinS