Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability: A Systematic Review
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2015
DOI
10.4085/1062-6050-50.9.01
Publication Title
Journal of Athletic Training
Volume
50
Issue
10
Pages
1019-1033
Abstract
Context: A comprehensive systematic literature review of the health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) differences among individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI), ankle-sprain copers, and healthy control participants has not been conducted. It could provide a better indication of the self-reported deficits that may be present in individuals with CAI.
Objective: To systematically summarize the extent to which HRQOL deficits are present in individuals with CAI.
Data Sources: We searched for articles in the electronic databases of EBSCO Host and PubMed Central using key words chronic, functional, mechanical, coper, instability, sprains, and patient-assessed. We also performed a hand search of reference lists, authors, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of the articles screened for inclusion.
Study Selection: Studies were included if they (1) incorporated a PRO as a participant descriptor or as a study outcome to compare adults with CAI to ankle-sprain copers or healthy controls, (2) were written in English, and (3) were published in peer-reviewed journals.
Data Extraction: Two authors independently assessed methodologic quality using the modified Downs and Black Index. Articles were filtered into 3 categories based on between-groups comparisons: CAI and copers, CAI and healthy control participants, copers and healthy participants. We calculated Hedges g effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals to examine PRO group differences.
Data Synthesis: Of the 124 studies assessed for eligibility, 27 were included. A total of 24 articles compared PROs in individuals with CAI and healthy controls, 7 compared individuals with CAI and copers, and 4 compared copers and healthy controls. Quality scores on the modified Downs and Black Index ranged from 52.9% to 88.2%, with 8 high-, 16 moderate-, and 3 low-quality studies. Overall, we observed moderate to strong evidence that individuals with CAI displayed deficits on generic and region-specific PROs compared with copers and healthy controls. However, evidence that differences exist between copers and healthy controls was conflicting. In addition, for dimension-specific outcomes, evidence to suggest that fear of reinjury is heightened in individuals with CAI was limited.
Conclusions: The evidence suggested that CAI is associated with functional and HRQOL deficits, particularly when examined with region-specific PROs. However, PROs do not appear to differ between copers and healthy controls.
Original Publication Citation
Houston, M. N., Hoch, J. M., & Hoch, M. C. (2015). Patient-reported outcome measures in individuals with chronic ankle instability: A systematic review. J Athl Train, 50(10), 1019-1033. doi:10.4085/1062-6050-50.9.01
Repository Citation
Houston, Megan N.; Hoch, Johanna M.; and Hoch, Matthew C., "Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability: A Systematic Review" (2015). Rehabilitation Sciences Faculty Publications. 30.
https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/pt_pubs/30
Comments
"Journal of Athletic Training and The Athletic Training Education Journal are both open access journals.
Consistent with the Budapest open access initiative (BOAI), all articles are free for users to access, read, download, and print. Information can be used providing that the source is appropriately acknowledged and/or referenced. An institution may post an author's manuscript in a digital repository. Any other posting on servers or replication of any content can be done only after obtaining permission from the NATA's publication office."
Publisher's version available at: https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-50.9.01