Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2015

DOI

10.1152/jn.00059.2015

Publication Title

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volume

114

Issue

3

Pages

1773-1783

Abstract

During gait, the trunk and neck are believed to play an important role in dissipating the transmission of forces from the ground to the head. This attenuation process is important to ensure head control is maintained. The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of externally restricting the motion of the trunk and/or neck segments on acceleration patterns of the upper body and head and related trunk muscle activity. Twelve healthy adults performed three walking trials on a flat, straight 65-m walkway, under four different bracing conditions: 1) control-no brace; 2) neck-braced; 3) trunk-braced; and 4) neck-trunk braced. Three-dimensional acceleration from the head, neck (C-7) and lower trunk (L-3) were collected, as was muscle activity from trunk. Results revealed that, when the neck and/or trunk were singularly braced, an overall decrease in the ability of the trunk to attenuate gait-related oscillations was observed, which led to increases in the amplitude of vertical acceleration for all segments. However, when the trunk and neck were braced together, acceleration amplitude across all segments decreased in line with increased attenuation from the neck to the head. Bracing was also reflected by increased activity in erector spinae, decreased abdominal muscle activity and lower trunk muscle coactivation. Overall, it would appear that the neuromuscular system of young, healthy individuals was able to maintain a consistent pattern of head acceleration, irrespective of the level of bracing, and that priority was placed over the control of vertical head accelerations during these gait tasks.

Comments

Web of Science: "Free full-text from publisher."

Original Publication Citation

Morrison, S., Russell, D. M., Kelleran, K., & Walker, M. L. (2015). Bracing of the trunk and neck has a differential effect on head control during gait. Journal of Neurophysiology, 114(3), 1773-1783. doi:10.1152/jn.00059.2015

Download

Share

COinS