Date of Award
Fall 2005
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts (MA)
Department
Chemistry & Biochemistry
Program/Concentration
Applied Sociology
Committee Director
James A. Nolan
Committee Member
Garland White
Committee Member
Ruth Triplett
Call Number for Print
Special Collections LD4331.S62 S656 2005
Abstract
This study evaluated the relationship between gender and sentencing severity for defendants convicted of violent crimes, victimless crimes, and theft crimes in Norfolk Circuit Court during 2001 and 2002. Based upon social control theories, the author hypothesized that women receive harsher penalties than men for violent crimes and victimless crimes, but that men receive harsher penalties for theft crimes. To test these hypotheses, the author relied, in part, upon data collected by the Norfolk Commonwealth Attorney's office on 3368 criminal cases filed in 2001 and concluded by May 22, 2002. After eliminating cases not pertinent to the study, the data set included 251 violent crimes, 261 victimless crimes, and 502 theft crimes. The author obtained sentence length and sentencing guideline information on these cases directly from the court files. Three different measures of sentence severity were used: sentence type, sentence length, and guideline compliance, with guideline compliance considered the most accurate measure because of the built-in controls for criminal history and offense severity. Age, race, method of adjudication, attorney type, and judge were the control variables. Using ANOVA, cross-tabulations, and multiple regression analysis, the results supported the hypothesis that women receive harsher punishment for victimless crimes, but did not support the other two hypotheses. Women, on average, received substantially shorter sentences than men convicted of violent crime, but the guideline compliance scores did not reveal any statistically significant difference in sentence severity for men and women convicted of violent crime. Men received longer jail sentences than women for theft crimes, but guideline compliance scores did not reveal a statistically significant difference in sentence severity between men and women except when controlled for race; then, women received harsher penalties than similarly situated men. Further research is recommended on the interaction between race and gender, and policy makers may need to revise guidelines to include relative culpability, parenting responsibility, and pregnancy, if these factors are deemed legitimate sentencing considerations.
Rights
In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
DOI
10.25777/fndq-f875
Recommended Citation
Spence, Fay F..
"Boys Will Be Boys: A Social Control Approach to Assessment of Gender-Based Sentencing Disparity in Norfolk Circuit Court Cases"
(2005). Master of Arts (MA), Thesis, Chemistry & Biochemistry, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/fndq-f875
https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/sociology_criminaljustice_etds/136
Included in
Courts Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Criminology Commons, Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons