Date of Award
Spring 2006
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts (MA)
Department
Sociology & Criminal Justice
Program/Concentration
Applied Sociology
Committee Director
Mona Danner
Committee Member
Ingrid P. Whitaker
Committee Member
Judi Caron-Sheppard
Call Number for Print
Special Collections LD4331.S62 I54 2006
Abstract
The welfare system in the United States underwent a major overhaul in 1996, transforming Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) to Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF). Since then, there has been little research conducted on attitudes toward welfare. This is still a topic worth investigating, as poverty and homelessness remain a problem in the United States.
This thesis hypothesized that attitudes about welfare would vary according to an individual's commitment to individualism, a hegemonic value in the United States. This thesis also hypothesized that welfare attitudes would vary according to an individual's education, gender, marital status, race, and religion.
Data from the 2000 National Election Study were used to investigate the following research questions: (1) To what extent, if any, is commitment to individualism and personal responsibility related to attitudes about welfare programs? (2) What demographic characteristics are also related to attitudes about welfare?
This thesis found that attitudes about welfare and Food Stamps, both means-tested programs, were much more negative than attitudes about Social Security, a contributory program. Commitment to individualism translated into negative attitudes about welfare programs. As commitment to individualism increased, support for welfare programs decreased. Unmarried individuals, minorities and non-Protestants were also more favorable towards welfare programs than married individuals, whites and Protestants. Finally, gender was significantly related only to attitudes about Social Security; females had slightly more positive attitudes about Social Security than males did.
Future research should include an investigation of the possible interaction between individualistic values and sociodemographic characteristics and how this, in turn, affects welfare attitudes. A qualitative study of welfare attitudes is also recommended to further investigate what guides such negative attitudes about these programs that assist the needy in the United States.
Rights
In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
DOI
10.25777/vnjq-e634
Recommended Citation
Ing, Emily C..
"Personal Responsibility Versus Government Responsibility Welfare Attitudes Post-1996"
(2006). Master of Arts (MA), Thesis, Sociology & Criminal Justice, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/vnjq-e634
https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/sociology_criminaljustice_etds/95
Included in
Inequality and Stratification Commons, Public Policy Commons, Social Policy Commons, Social Psychology and Interaction Commons