Date of Award

Summer 8-2022

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Department

Teaching & Learning

Program/Concentration

Curriculum and Instruction

Committee Director

Jori S. Beck

Committee Member

Thomas W. Bean

Committee Member

Joseph Morgan

Committee Member

Kala N. Burrell-Craft

Abstract

The present study used a sequential mixed method design to compare special education and general education elementary teachers’ self-efficacy for data-driven decision making. Participants were 127 teachers from several school divisions in a mid-Atlantic state in the United States. Dunn et al.’s (2013a) The Data-Driven Decision Making Efficacy and Anxiety Inventory (3D-MEA) was used for this study along with Tschannen-Moran and Hoy’s (2001) The Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale (TSES), specifically the subscale on the efficacy of instructional strategies. According to the quantitative findings, there was a statistically significant difference between special education and general education teachers’ efficacy for application of data to instruction scale. The study did not reveal any statistically significant difference between special education and general education elementary teachers’ beliefs about self-efficacy for DDDM in the five other factors examined in the survey. The structured qualitative interview revealed that special education and general education elementary teachers had experience with student data in pre-service classes or on-the-job training. Further, the interviews revealed that the teachers exhibited self-efficacy for DDDM in their area of certification.

Rights

In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).

DOI

10.25777/0fcb-hk12

ISBN

9798352694008

ORCID

0000-0003-4696-174X

Share

COinS