Document Type
Conference Paper
Publication Date
2024
Publication Title
eLearn: World Conference on EdTech 2024
Pages
1-7
Conference Name
eLearn: World Conference on EdTech, Oct. 7-10, 2024, Singapore, Singapore
Abstract
This study examines pre-service teachers’ (PSTs’) responses to using AI to review their writing. As part of a class activity, PSTs prompted an AI-chatbot for feedback and revisions on a short essay based on a provided assignment rubric. Afterward, they reflected on the pros and cons of using AI in this way. While some PSTs initially encountered functionality issues, all were able to obtain feedback and the majority reported finding it useful. In general, the PSTs appreciated AI’s speed and expertise and the potential to customize feedback based on their needs. However, many were skeptical of AI’s evaluation of their writing and critical of AI’s revisions, particularly to changes in vocabulary, with some noting a loss of voice. The authors emphasize the importance of developing PSTs’ AI literacy skills and requiring critical reflections as part of any AI-supported review process.
Rights
Copyright by AACE. Reprinted from with permission of AACE (https://aace.org)
ORCID
0000-0001-9800-1690 (Kidd)
Original Publication Citation
Kidd, J., Parker, K. & Myers, S. (2024). “AI’s pompous vocabulary sounds like it’s trying to impress someone”: Preservice teachers’ respond to AI reviews of their writing. In C. Bonk & G. Marks (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1-7). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/224975/.
Repository Citation
Kidd, Jennifer; Parker, Keri; and Myers, Samantha, ""AI's Pompous Vocabulary Sounds Like It's Trying to Impress Someone": Preservice Teachers' Respond to AI Reviews of their Writing" (2024). Teaching & Learning Faculty Publications. 263.
https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/teachinglearning_fac_pubs/263
Included in
Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Commons, Educational Technology Commons, Teacher Education and Professional Development Commons
Comments
Editors: Curtis J. Bonk, Gary H. Marks.