Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2026
DOI
10.1007/s11205-025-03732-5
Publication Title
Social Indicators Research
Volume
182
Issue
1
Pages
1
Abstract
Social safety and social security are concepts that help explain a community's well-being by assessing how it manages and mitigate existing, or perceived, risks. However, these terms are often conflated, which can limit understanding, particularly in areas with unstable living conditions. This study explores both concepts in the context of residents living in slums. As the number of displaced people grows, slums and informal settlements are becoming increasingly common worldwide, making it essential to clarify these concepts. Residents of slums face numerous hazards, including crime, violence, inadequate housing, overcrowding, and limited access to essential services. To measure social safety and social security, we developed two survey instruments. These were administered in Khayelitsha Site C, a post-apartheid township in Cape Town that includes both formal and informal settlements. We analyzed data from 514 participants using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, which confirmed the multidimensional nature of both concepts. The social safety instrument was refined to include ten items focused on perceptions of environmental risk, crime, and infrastructure, achieving a reliability score of (Ω = 0.90). The social security instrument, refined to eleven items, addresses environmental prevention, community leadership support, crime prevention, and health protection, with a reliability score of (Ω = 0.80). Both instruments demonstrated strong statistical validity through internal consistency, as well as evidence of convergent and discriminant validity. This research provides new, reliable tools for examining the challenges of social safety and social security in slums, offering actionable insights for policymakers and community development efforts.
Rights
© The Authors 2025
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Data Availability
Article states: "The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in the Social Safety and Social Security Database at https://osf.io/vytc9/overview?view_only=a2fc096c7cab477f875020325b62e1f7.
All shared data have been fully anonymized to protect participants’ confidentiality."
Original Publication Citation
Romero, L. D., Palacio, K., Ako Abang, Z., Silgado, V., Llinas, H., González, L., Frydenlund, E., Bolivar, D., & Padilla, J. J. (2026). Social safety and social security: Validating context-specific instruments for slums. Social Indicators Research, 182(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-025-03732-5
ORCID
0000-0002-7694-7845 (Frydenlund)
Repository Citation
Romero, Liss D.; Palacio, Katherine; Abang, Zacheous Ako; Silgado, Valeria; Llinas, Humberto; González, Leidy; Frydenlund, Erika; Bolivar, Daniel; and Padilla, Jose J., "Social Safety and Social Security: Validating Context-Specific Instruments for Slums" (2026). VMASC Publications. 156.
https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/vmasc_pubs/156
Included in
Africana Studies Commons, Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Criminology Commons, Defense and Security Studies Commons