Date of Award
Summer 8-1990
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Science (MS)
Department
Community & Environmental Health
Program/Concentration
Community Health Education
Committee Director
David A. Sterling
Committee Member
Gregory H. Frazer
Committee Member
Scott R. Sechrist
Call Number for Print
Special Collections LD4331.C48S49
Abstract
This study was performed to determine if there is a quantifiable difference between quantitative fit testing using a probed facepiece and a probed cartridge. Four subjects were tested on four different respirators. The respirators used were MSA & 3M full and half face respirator. Each subject performed each method five times per respirator. The results indicated no correlation between the two fit testing methods overall. However, a moderate correlation was found between the MSA respirators and the two methods. This study found many variables which influence fit testing. These include the type of respirator used (brand and facepiece), the probe location, the probe depth, and the variability found between donnings.
In conclusion, the probed cartridge method is an acceptable method for conducting quantitative fit tests. The probed cartridge would provide for a method to use a wearers own respirator to perform the quantitative fit test. This method would result in a more representative individual fit factor.
Rights
In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
DOI
10.25777/pab0-js05
Recommended Citation
Seward, Sonya M..
"Quantitative Respirator Fit Testing: Probed Facepiece versus Probed Cartridge"
(1990). Master of Science (MS), Thesis, Community & Environmental Health, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/pab0-js05
https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/commhealth_etds/22
Included in
Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment Commons, Health Services Research Commons, Pulmonology Commons