Date of Award
Spring 2015
Document Type
Dissertation
Degree Name
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Department
Engineering Management & Systems Engineering
Committee Director
Charles B. Daniels
Committee Member
Ipek Bozkurt
Committee Member
Resit Unal
Committee Member
Cesar A. Pinto
Abstract
This paper addresses one aspect of the opportunity for corporations to reduce leadership development infrastructure by narrowing the participant pool to candidates that, intuitively, may be multi-skilled and capable of handling diverse roles and assignments within the corporate environment. In particular, the study seeks to determine the effect that engineering education has on leadership style by comparing the leadership style of certified project managers (CPMs), and non-CPM managers with engineering degrees, to the same for CPMs, and non-CPM managers, who do not possess engineering degrees. Engineering degrees may be further defined as mechanical, electrical, industrial and the like. Leadership styles are partitioned into transformational, transactional and passive avoidant as per established scholarly definitions. The underlying assumption is that transformational leadership is a preferred leadership style in the corporate sector. CPMs, and non-CPMs, with and without engineering degrees, will comprise the sampling population. While it is beyond the scope of the current proposal to address the broader potential relationship between engineering skills and effective leadership, knowledge gained regarding the potential relationship between engineering education and leadership style may serve as the impetus for addressing the broader topic. An analysis of the sampled population suggests, at an alpha of .05, that a relationship exists between leadership style and engineering education with those managers in possession of engineering degrees testing as more transformational and transactional than the same without engineering degrees. However, at the same level of statistical significance, neither transformational nor transactional leadership styles were determined to be the predominant style of leadership among the groups with or without engineering degrees.
DOI
10.25777/86vv-tp89
ISBN
9781321843002
Recommended Citation
Calloway, Jesse L..
"Management and Leadership Style: Is Style Influenced by Engineering Education?"
(2015). Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Dissertation, Engineering Management & Systems Engineering, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/86vv-tp89
https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/emse_etds/62
Included in
Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, Cognitive Psychology Commons, Engineering Education Commons, Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons, Systems Engineering Commons