Date of Award
Spring 2010
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Science in Education (MSEd)
Department
Human Movement Sciences
Program/Concentration
Athletic Training
Committee Director
James Onate
Committee Director
Bonnie Van Lunen
Committee Member
Stacie Ringleb
Call Number for Print
Special Collections LD4331.E44 Q36 2010
Abstract
Altered neuromuscular control strategies and biomechanical movement risk factors are most likely to contribute to the increased incidence of non-contact ACL injury for female athletes. Neuromuscular control strategies and movement patterns are further altered when the effects of fatigue are present. The purpose of this study was to determine neuromechanical differences between two fatigue protocols [Slow Linear Oxidative Fatigue Protocol (SLO-FP) and Functional Agility Short-Term Fatigue Protocol (FASTFP)] when performing a running stop-jump task (RS). A sample of convenience of fifteen Division I female soccer players (age= 19.2 ± 0.8 years; height= 1.67 ± 0.05 m; mass= 61.7 ± 8.1 kg) participated in this study. Participants performed five successful trials of a RS task pre and post fatigue protocols. For the SLO-FP, a VO2peak test was conducted prior to the fatigue protocol. Five minutes after the conclusion of VO2pcak test subjects started the fatigue protocol by performing a 30-minute interval run with six intervals. The FAST-FP consisted of 4 sets of a functional circuit that included: L-Drill, Ladder, Vertical Jumps, and step-ups. Repeated 2 (time) x 2 (protocol) ANOVAs were conducted to assess task and fatigue differences. Alpha level was set at .05. During SLOFP participants had increased internal varus moment at initial contact (0.064±0.09Nm/Kgm) when compared with the FAST-FP (0.024±0.06Nm/kgm), p=0.033. Participants were in significantly lower hip flexion at initial contact post-fatigue (44. 7±8.1 °) when compared with pre-fatigue (50.1±9.5°), p=0.001 as well as at peak vertical ground reaction force post-fatigue (44.7±8.4°) when compared with pre-fatigue (50.4±10.3°), p=0.001; at peak posterior ground reaction force post-fatigue (45.2±8.6°) when compared with pre-fatigue (51.1±10.8°), p=0.001; at peak knee flexion post-fatigue (38.7±8.7°) when compared with pre-fatigue (45.1±11.6°), p=0.001, and at max hip flexion post-fatigue (47.3±8.2°) when compared with pre-fatigue (53.3±10.95°), p=0.001. During SLO-FP subjects had increased knee extension moment (2.0l±.32Nm/K.gm) when compared with the FASTFP (1.9±.36Nm/Kgm), p=0.033. Both protocols induced similar changes to our subjects lower extremity biomechanics, the FAST-FP induced changes in as little as five minutes whereas the SLO-FP took 45 minutes to induce similar biomechanical changes. Our results demonstrated a decrease in hip and knee flexion angles at post-fatigue condition. Landing in an upright position has been shown to increase anterior tibial shear force, which augments the loads on the ACL.
Rights
In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
DOI
10.25777/k1qc-gh39
Recommended Citation
Quammen, David L..
"The Effects of Two Different Fatigue Protocols on Lower Extremity Kinematics and Kinetics During an Unanticipated Running Stop-Jump"
(2010). Master of Science in Education (MSEd), Thesis, Human Movement Sciences, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/k1qc-gh39
https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/hms_etds/89
Included in
Biomechanics Commons, Exercise Physiology Commons, Exercise Science Commons, Motor Control Commons