Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2023

DOI

10.47989/ir283198

Publication Title

Information Research

Volume

28

Issue

3

Pages

83-109

Abstract

Introduction. This multi-year, mixed-methods study compares (a) the reasons administrators and librarians of academic libraries invest in assistive technology for delivering information services to students with disabilities, with (b) the benefits that influence these students’ intention to use AT.

Method. In the first phase, 50 library administrators and 22 librarians from 186 public universities across the US shared their top-three reasons for investing in assistive technology through a qualitative survey. In the second phase, 322 students with disabilities from the same institutions completed a quantitative survey, in which respondents shared individual-level benefits that influence their intention to use assistive technology.

Analysis. We utilised thematic analysis and structural equation modelling to analyse data in the first and second phases, respectively.

Results. Three individual, three organisational, and three societal benefits prompt academic libraries’ investment in assistive technology. However, only two individual benefits – increasing information literacy and completing academic tasks – significantly influence the intention of students with disabilities to use the technology. In addition, neither academic libraries nor students, perceive the technology to be valuable for enhancing autonomy and the self (i.e., self-esteem, self-efficacy, and self-image) of students with disabilities.

Conclusion. Implications for academic libraries that provide information services to students with disabilities are discussed at the end.

Rights

© 2023 Devendra Potnis, Kevin Mallary

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License.

Original Publication Citation

Potnis, D., & Mallary, K. (2023). Comparing the “value of information services” for providers and vulnerable patrons: A mixed-methods study with academic libraries and students with disabilities. Information Research, 28(3), 83-109. https://informationr.net/infres/article/view/198

Download

Share

COinS