Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2018
Publication Title
Contemporary Educational Technology
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
42-60
Abstract
Conveying scientific information with high intrinsic cognitive load to students is a challenge. Often, students do not have the existing schema to incorporate the information in a comprehensive manner. One method that has shown promise is storytelling. Storytelling has been successfully used to convey public health information to non-experts. Therefore, it was of interest to determine whether storytelling could be used in the classroom to present information with high intrinsic load to students in a meaningful manner. This study used a post-test only quasi-experimental study design to explore the utility of storytelling as an instructional strategy in anatomy and physiology classes at a community college. Students in the treatment group received instruction that used storytelling to present examples of application. Both control and experimental groups were assessed through the use of a proximal formative quiz, distal multiple-choice questions, and a novel critical thinking exercise administered after the instruction. Results suggest that storytelling was as effective as the instructional methods delivered to the control group. These findings suggest that storytelling may be used as a means to convey complex scientific information in the classroom.
Original Publication Citation
Csikar, E., & Stefaniak, J. E. (2018). The utility of storytelling strategies in the biology classroom. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(1), 42-60.
Repository Citation
Csikar, Elizabeth and Stefaniak, Jill E., "The Utility of Storytelling Strategies in the Biology Classroom" (2018). STEMPS Faculty Publications. 56.
https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/stemps_fac_pubs/56
Included in
Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Educational Methods Commons, Science and Mathematics Education Commons
Comments
Contemporary Educational Technology is a truly open-access journal. There is no handling charge or publication fee for authors. They simply submit their manuscripts, the reviewers evaluate the assigned papers, the authors complete the revisions when necessary, and the editors make the decision whether to publish the manuscript or not. If the final decision is positive, the authors are informed and the article appears in one of the upcoming issues.