Author ORCID Identifier
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3656-8282
Document Type
Conceptual Article
Abstract
Clinical reasoning has long guided diagnostic accuracy in nursing and medical fields, but its application in mental health counseling remains limited. This paper presents a conceptual diagnostic decision-making (DDM) process to embed clinical reasoning into the diagnostic process for counselors, incorporating two vital constructs: counselor self-efficacy and counselor bias (implicit and explicit). Grounded in Bandura’s theory of self-efficacy (1977) and Carvalho et al.’s (2017) clinical reasoning model, the framework highlights the cognitive, behavioral, and contextual factors that shape diagnostic decision-making in early-career counselors, including counselor biases. The paper calls for reform in counselor training, emphasizing curriculum enhancements as pathways to more ethical, accurate, and culturally responsive diagnoses. Integrating clinical reasoning into counselor education may help reduce misdiagnosis and promote more equitable mental health practices.
Recommended Citation
Waddington, A. F., Fields, A. M., & Ault, H. (2026). Integrating clinical reasoning into mental health diagnosis: A conceptual framework for counseling practice. Journal of Human Services Scholarship and Interprofessional Collaboration, 3(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.25779/ceqv-n978
DOI
10.25779/ceqv-n978
Included in
Counselor Education Commons, Other Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons, Psychiatric and Mental Health Commons, Psychology Commons